The following is my response to a colleague and friend's recent post on object-oriented ontology over at The New Knowledge Ecology. --------------------------------------- It is probably possible to distinguish between a defense of OOO from an unfair caricature and a defense of OOO proper. I think what you've done here is a solid mixture of each. It is [...]
Month: February 2011
Meister Eckhart and the Core of the Soul
For a little more than a week now, I've been engaging with Graham Harman's object-oriented approach to philosophy. I'm intrigued, but not yet convinced by his tactics. I still have questions about access, about epistemology. How do I know anything about mind-independent objects if their essence remains infinitely hidden? I'm forced to rely upon analogy, the most [...]
Metaphor and the Allure of Objects
I've just finished Harman's chapters on Metaphor and Humor in Guerrilla Metaphysics. He explores the meaning-making capacities of language and laughter in the hopes that they might help account for how objects are capable of interaction despite their infinite concealment from one another. Through his explorations into Ortega y Gasset's ontology of metaphor and Bergson's account [...]
Harman and the Special Magic of Human Knowledge
Among the most often tagged names on this blog are Rudolf Steiner and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, both of whose cosmologies privilege the position of human beings relative to other beings. The reasons for this elevation of human consciousness are complex, but in a word they issue from an intuition about selfhood. Both men dwell [...]
Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology
I've just finished part one of Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things, Harman's treatise on the relationship between the phenomenology of Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Lingis and his object-oriented approach to philosophy. He is motivated by a desire to direct our attention to the things themselves, the independently existing objects of the world. It [...]
Graham Harman and James Hillman
The following is an exchange between Adam Robbert and I about the parallels between the speculative realism of Graham Harman and the re-visioned archetypal psychology of James Hillman: Harman quoted by Adam (ellipses are used to increase continuity): "Amidst all the repetitious manifestoes and dry meta-descriptions of human consciousness, we also find the works of [...]
