There was a period of about 3 months back in college when Wittgenstein was all I could read (this essay emerged out of that period). His genius had infected me. I was sure his solutions had dissolved all my philosophical problems (indeed, I thought he’d cured me of philosophy). Of course, back in college, I had only just begun to construct philosophical problems for myself. At that point my collection was minuscule. The most confusing of my two or three problems was the so-called “mind/body” problem–a problem that Wittgenstein’s words seemed to be working therapeutically upon like a sore knot in my semantic musculature. In time, however, I came to learn of many new problems… like the “body/body” problem, and the “zombie” problem, and of course the “I/me” problem… Wittgenstein was never refuted or surpassed for me, far from it! But his solutions began to fade from memory as unforeseen philosophical problems continued to multiply. Even if Wittgenstein did in some sense solve the “mind/body” problem for me, the new problems which emerged began to seem less like stiff muscles and more like the growth of new appendages or new organs of perception.
“Philosophy begins in wonder. And, at the end, when philosophic thought has done its best, the wonder remains.”
—Alfred North Whitehead
Recent Posts
- Stream on Capitol Insurrection January 10, 2021
- “How does matter give rise to consciousness?” (response to Sam Harris) January 3, 2021
- A review of Michael Hogue’s “American Immanence: Democracy for an Uncertain World” (2018) December 18, 2020
- Voices of VR podcast: A Primer on Whitehead’s Process Philosophy December 10, 2020
- Who are we? (thinking w/ Berry and Swimme) December 9, 2020
- Thinking with Carlo Rovelli: The Physics of Consciousness December 3, 2020
- Science and the Soul of the World: Participatory Knowing in Goethe and Whitehead November 25, 2020
- Dialoguing with Philip Goff about Consciousness, Panpsychism, and Process Philosophy November 18, 2020
- Concrescence and the Implicate Order: Whitehead and Bohm in Dialogue November 8, 2020
- Election Coverage: Live-streaming on Growing Down November 3, 2020
- Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism) October 30, 2020
- Apology for a Democratic Ontology (response to Keith Woods) October 29, 2020
- Rune Soup Podcast with Gordon White: Talking Whitehead, Plato, & Panpsychism October 24, 2020
- Thinking Cosmologically with Whitehead October 21, 2020
- Towards a Marian Consciousness (Ep. 1 of the Great American Road Trip Diaries) October 21, 2020
- Alchemical Consciousness After Descartes: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism as Psychedelic Realism October 15, 2020
- American Immanental Philosophies and the Future of Theopolitics: Dialoging with Michael Hogue October 15, 2020
- The brain is not a computer, and thinking is not information-processing. October 14, 2020
- “The Great American Trip,” dialogue on “Growing Down” October 10, 2020
- Rupert Sheldrake on Whitehead September 26, 2020
- Reason, Reality, & Religion in the Making (dialoguing with John Vervaeke) September 13, 2020
- Naturphilosophie as Process Philosophy in Schelling and Whitehead August 30, 2020
- Meta-Linguistics (dialoguing with Layman Pascal) August 29, 2020
- Metamodernism, the Integral Left, and Postmodern Traditionalism (dialoguing with Brent Cooper) August 27, 2020
- Parsimonious Panpsychism? (response to Julian Walker) August 25, 2020
- Emergent Evolution in a Panpsychist Cosmos (dialoging with Corey Anton) August 22, 2020
- Setting the Akashic Record Straight (final response to David Long about emergence and panpsychism) August 21, 2020
- What is at stake in cosmological inquiry? August 20, 2020
- Cosmologies in Question: A Debate with David Long August 19, 2020
- Consciousness in the Wild August 17, 2020
- Toward an Integral “God” – a dialogue with Layman Pascal August 14, 2020
- Death Denial in a Panpsychist Cosmos: A Dialogue with Corey Anton August 11, 2020
- Meta-Politics – a discussion with Layman Pascal on “The Integral Stage” August 8, 2020
- Remembering and Carrying Forward Michael Brooks on “Growing Down” July 25, 2020
- Dialogue with a Whiteheadian Thelemite Vajrayanist Wiccan, Sam Webster July 22, 2020
- The Rheomode Series, a YouTube playlist July 16, 2020
- Integral Entheogens (Ep. 5) – Molecular Alchemy and the Evolution of Spirit July 16, 2020
- Growing Down Podcast on “the Integral Left” July 4, 2020
- Dialoguing with Brent Cooper about ecosocialist politics and integral spirituality June 9, 2020
- “He maketh his sun to rise,” featuring Donald Trump, Cornel West, and Ram Dass June 4, 2020
- The Place of Psychedelic Chemistry/Alchemical Consciousness in Philosophy May 8, 2020
- Imagination as the Topographical Inversion of Reality: Musings with Becca Tarnas May 7, 2020
- Episode 6 of The Future Faces of Spirit April 25, 2020
- Reading and Riffing on Murray Bookchin’s “The Ecology of Freedom” April 15, 2020
- Prayers to a Process-Relational God April 12, 2020
- Ecological Civilization, or Anarcho-Primitivism? March 30, 2020
- Imagining a Gaian Reality After the Virus March 23, 2020
- Thoughts on William James, Pure Experience, and Materialism February 2, 2020
- Musing on “Consciousness” with William James & Alfred North Whitehead January 31, 2020
- What is life? interview with Tim Freke January 17, 2020
#occupy
aesthetics
alchemy
Anima mundi
Anthropos
archetypal cosmology
atheism
biology
Buddhism
burning man
capitalism
causality
Chaos
Christ
christianity
cognitive science
Consciousness
Cosmogenesis
cosmology
cosmopolitics
cosmotheandric
creativity
death
earth
ecological crisis
ecology
economics
emergence
eternal object
etheric imagination
evolution
Evolution of consciousness
freedom
Gaia
German Idealism
god
imagination
integral
language
life
logos
love
materialism
media ecology
metaphysics
mind
myth
nature
Naturphilosophie
neuroscience
Object-oriented ontology
Ontology
organism
Panpsychism
phenomenology
philosophy
physics
play
pluralism
politics
Process
Process philosophy
Psychedelics
Religion
science
soul
soul-making
space-time
Spirit
spirituality
technology
teleology
theology
time
world-soul
Alan Watts Albert Einstein Alfred North Whitehead Ancient Philosophy Aristotle autopoiesis Brian Swimme Bruno Latour Carl Jung Catherine Keller Coleridge Copernican Revolution Daniel Dennett Darwin David Chalmers Descartes Donna Haraway Edmund Husserl Evan Thompson Extended Mind Fichte Francisco Varela galileo Gilles Deleuze Goethe Graham Harman Hegel Heidegger henri bergson Hume Iain Hamilton Grant imagination Isabelle Stengers Jakob Böhme James Hillman Jean Gebser john Keats Kant kepler Levi Bryant Modern Philosophy Owen Barfield Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Plato poetry politics PZ Myers quentin meillassoux race Raimon Panikkar Ralph Waldo Emerson Ray Brassier reason Religion Richard Dawkins Richard Tarnas Robert N. Bellah Romantic Philosophy rudolf steiner Schelling Sean Kelly Socrates speculative realism Spinoza Steven Shaviro Thomas Berry Timothy Morton Travel William James Wittgenstein
Posts I Like
Archives
Top Clicks
- ciis.edu/faculty-and-staff-director…
- academia.edu/27796967/2016_Shook_Pa…
- schumachercollege.org.uk/courses/sh…
- voicesofvr.com/primer-on-whiteheads…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- dayxdayxlife.wordpress.com/2017/12/…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- garygoldbergmd.wordpress.com
- tomcarter12.wordpress.com
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(…
Copyright

footnotes2plato.com by Matthew David Segall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Blog Stats
- 642,024 hits
Albert Einstein Alfred North Whitehead Ancient Philosophy Aristotle autopoiesis Brian Swimme Bruno Latour Carl Jung Coleridge Copernican Revolution Daniel Dennett Darwin Descartes Edmund Husserl Evan Thompson Fichte Francisco Varela galileo Gilles Deleuze Goethe Graham Harman Hegel Heidegger henri bergson Hume Iain Hamilton Grant imagination Isabelle Stengers Jakob Böhme Jean Gebser Kant kepler Levi Bryant Modern Philosophy Owen Barfield Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Plato poetry politics race reason Religion Richard Dawkins Richard Tarnas Romantic Philosophy rudolf steiner Schelling Sean Kelly speculative realism William James
Recent Posts
- Stream on Capitol Insurrection January 10, 2021
- “How does matter give rise to consciousness?” (response to Sam Harris) January 3, 2021
- A review of Michael Hogue’s “American Immanence: Democracy for an Uncertain World” (2018) December 18, 2020
- Voices of VR podcast: A Primer on Whitehead’s Process Philosophy December 10, 2020
- Who are we? (thinking w/ Berry and Swimme) December 9, 2020
- Thinking with Carlo Rovelli: The Physics of Consciousness December 3, 2020
- Science and the Soul of the World: Participatory Knowing in Goethe and Whitehead November 25, 2020
- Dialoguing with Philip Goff about Consciousness, Panpsychism, and Process Philosophy November 18, 2020
- Concrescence and the Implicate Order: Whitehead and Bohm in Dialogue November 8, 2020
- Election Coverage: Live-streaming on Growing Down November 3, 2020
- Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism) October 30, 2020
- Apology for a Democratic Ontology (response to Keith Woods) October 29, 2020
- Rune Soup Podcast with Gordon White: Talking Whitehead, Plato, & Panpsychism October 24, 2020
- Thinking Cosmologically with Whitehead October 21, 2020
- Towards a Marian Consciousness (Ep. 1 of the Great American Road Trip Diaries) October 21, 2020
- Alchemical Consciousness After Descartes: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism as Psychedelic Realism October 15, 2020
- American Immanental Philosophies and the Future of Theopolitics: Dialoging with Michael Hogue October 15, 2020
- The brain is not a computer, and thinking is not information-processing. October 14, 2020
- “The Great American Trip,” dialogue on “Growing Down” October 10, 2020
- Rupert Sheldrake on Whitehead September 26, 2020
- Reason, Reality, & Religion in the Making (dialoguing with John Vervaeke) September 13, 2020
- Naturphilosophie as Process Philosophy in Schelling and Whitehead August 30, 2020
- Meta-Linguistics (dialoguing with Layman Pascal) August 29, 2020
- Metamodernism, the Integral Left, and Postmodern Traditionalism (dialoguing with Brent Cooper) August 27, 2020
- Parsimonious Panpsychism? (response to Julian Walker) August 25, 2020
- Emergent Evolution in a Panpsychist Cosmos (dialoging with Corey Anton) August 22, 2020
- Setting the Akashic Record Straight (final response to David Long about emergence and panpsychism) August 21, 2020
- What is at stake in cosmological inquiry? August 20, 2020
- Cosmologies in Question: A Debate with David Long August 19, 2020
- Consciousness in the Wild August 17, 2020
- Toward an Integral “God” – a dialogue with Layman Pascal August 14, 2020
- Death Denial in a Panpsychist Cosmos: A Dialogue with Corey Anton August 11, 2020
- Meta-Politics – a discussion with Layman Pascal on “The Integral Stage” August 8, 2020
- Remembering and Carrying Forward Michael Brooks on “Growing Down” July 25, 2020
- Dialogue with a Whiteheadian Thelemite Vajrayanist Wiccan, Sam Webster July 22, 2020
- The Rheomode Series, a YouTube playlist July 16, 2020
- Integral Entheogens (Ep. 5) – Molecular Alchemy and the Evolution of Spirit July 16, 2020
- Growing Down Podcast on “the Integral Left” July 4, 2020
- Dialoguing with Brent Cooper about ecosocialist politics and integral spirituality June 9, 2020
- “He maketh his sun to rise,” featuring Donald Trump, Cornel West, and Ram Dass June 4, 2020
- The Place of Psychedelic Chemistry/Alchemical Consciousness in Philosophy May 8, 2020
- Imagination as the Topographical Inversion of Reality: Musings with Becca Tarnas May 7, 2020
- Episode 6 of The Future Faces of Spirit April 25, 2020
- Reading and Riffing on Murray Bookchin’s “The Ecology of Freedom” April 15, 2020
- Prayers to a Process-Relational God April 12, 2020
- Ecological Civilization, or Anarcho-Primitivism? March 30, 2020
- Imagining a Gaian Reality After the Virus March 23, 2020
- Thoughts on William James, Pure Experience, and Materialism February 2, 2020
- Musing on “Consciousness” with William James & Alfred North Whitehead January 31, 2020
- What is life? interview with Tim Freke January 17, 2020
#occupy
aesthetics
alchemy
Anima mundi
Anthropos
archetypal cosmology
atheism
biology
Buddhism
burning man
capitalism
causality
Chaos
Christ
christianity
cognitive science
Consciousness
Cosmogenesis
cosmology
cosmopolitics
cosmotheandric
creativity
death
earth
ecological crisis
ecology
economics
emergence
eternal object
etheric imagination
evolution
Evolution of consciousness
freedom
Gaia
German Idealism
god
imagination
integral
language
life
logos
love
materialism
media ecology
metaphysics
mind
myth
nature
Naturphilosophie
neuroscience
Object-oriented ontology
Ontology
organism
Panpsychism
phenomenology
philosophy
physics
play
pluralism
politics
Process
Process philosophy
Psychedelics
Religion
science
soul
soul-making
space-time
Spirit
spirituality
technology
teleology
theology
time
world-soul
Posts I Like
Archives
Top Clicks
- ciis.edu/faculty-and-staff-director…
- academia.edu/27796967/2016_Shook_Pa…
- schumachercollege.org.uk/courses/sh…
- voicesofvr.com/primer-on-whiteheads…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- dayxdayxlife.wordpress.com/2017/12/…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- garygoldbergmd.wordpress.com
- tomcarter12.wordpress.com
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(…
Copyright

footnotes2plato.com by Matthew David Segall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Blog Stats
- 642,024 hits
This is very interesting. I am planning to study Wittgenstein thoroughly next year when I will start my PhD. I am a linguistics student and this quote : “the limits of my language are the limits of my mind” has deeply marked me. I am interested in delving deeper into this by doing comparative linguistics and looking at how language influences mind.
Sounds like a very interesting project! What, pray, is language, anyway? Or what do you think it is, at least?
That’s a very hard question to answer. For my research, language will be defined as a system of communication and symbols that we use to represent different aspects of existence.
What do YOU think language is?
Yes, definitely a hard question! For my part, I don’t think language has all that much to do with communication. Plenty of creatures communicate with one another and we don’t seem to want to call that language. Plus we spend at least as much time talking to ourselves as we do sharing words with other people. So the core of language would seem to be something other that communication. A deep mystery! If I had to wager, I’d say self-reference is more essential to language than communication.
What do you mean by self-reference being more “essential to language than communication”?
what is “self-reference”
I would ask the same! what is self-reference?
Im about to go sailing!, so ill explain a bit later. but for now check out: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-reference#In_language
Sounds good! enjoy your sailing!!
So when I said language is more about self-reference than communication, I was trying to be provocative more than anything else (surprise surprise); but I still want to follow the same provocative course of thought… I want to really challenge the common sense idea that language is just a tool, just the mind’s way of getting its thought communicated. I agree it’s hard not to think of language this way. The alternative understanding of language as self-referential will remain paradoxical until the old paradigm of separate minds rationally exchanging information with one another across the uncanny gaps cut open between one person’s mouth and another person’s ears has been seen through. If we accept that there are no such things as separate minds to exchange information between the sensory organs of their physical bodies, but that instead whatever we do when we “do language” with one another has more to do with what the self (or the genius) of language wants to express than it does with “my” mind or “your” mind. When we do language with one another, we are not separate minds communicating across a series of gaps (as if meaning traveled from “in” me to “out” there, and then from “out” there to “in” you). I’m more inclined to think that when we do language together, we participate in or commune with the creative force of logos, with the divine mind itself. At least this is what is aways possible whenever we do language together. Sometimes we speak in a more economic way, when we are interested in a monetary exchange of some sort rather than in a sacred communion. But exchange is not the essence of language. Co-creative expression is the essence of language.
What about deconstruction? You are talking about “the creative force of the logo” are you saying that language is a system over which we have no control and that we are, when speaking, entering a process which is self-governed and we become therefore agents of that process?
But what if this “system” is a made up one? It’s based on arbitrariness.
Well, it sort of makes sense though, if we see it this way. It’s a system made up of random relationships over which we have no power.
It also can be something else. I think this quote by Noam Chomsky says something else about language:
” Language can surely be used for communication, as can anything people do, but it is not unreasonable to adopt the traditional view that language is primarily an instrument for expression of though, to others or to oneself; statistically speaking, use of language is overwherlmingly internal, as can easily be determined by introspection”
What do you think?