Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism)

If you prefer to listen to me read this blog post: tl;dr Panpsychism = All is psyche, which is to say human consciousness and visible Nature take place within the World-Soul. Most moderns have accepted as a matter of course that the best people to speak on behalf of Nature are the scientists. Scientists are […]

Continue reading "Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism)"

Archetypal Panpsychism: Whitehead, Jung, and Hillman

Originally posted on Becca Tarnas:
This upcoming weekend, on January 20 and 21, Matthew Segall and I will be presenting together for the Idaho Friends of Jung in Boise on “Archetypal Panpsychism: Whitehead, Jung, and Hillman.” Together we will make the case that a Whiteheadian cosmology is not only compatible with archetypal psychology, but provides a metaphysical…

Continue reading "Archetypal Panpsychism: Whitehead, Jung, and Hillman"

John Horgan’s article in “Scientific American” on Panpsychism

John Horgan published an essay in Scientific American a few days ago criticizing Tononi’s integrated information theory of consciousness. I don’t understand Integrated Information Theory well enough to defend it, but I applaud the effort to make progress toward a scientifically operationalizable definition of consciousness. But it seems to me that part of the problem […]

Continue reading "John Horgan’s article in “Scientific American” on Panpsychism"

Pluralistic Panpsychism and Mystical Experience: a response to Kastrup (part 2 of 2)

[This is part 2 of my response to Bernardo Kastrup; part 1 is here]. Kastrup is confused by what I said in my original response to him regarding the room that ontological pluralism leaves for both the extraordinary experience of unity and the ordinary experience of plurality. Ontological pluralism seems more true to experience (both […]

Continue reading "Pluralistic Panpsychism and Mystical Experience: a response to Kastrup (part 2 of 2)"

Pluralistic Panpsychism v. Monistic Idealism: another response to Kastrup (part 1 of 2)

Kastrup has responded to my post a few days ago. The topic? Panpsychism. In any back and forth discussion like this, it is important to acknowledge that each of us has evidently written a great deal articulating our perspectives. Other than his brief essay on the threat of panpsychism, I have not read any of Kastrup’s […]

Continue reading "Pluralistic Panpsychism v. Monistic Idealism: another response to Kastrup (part 1 of 2)"

The Threat of Panpsychism?: A response to Bernardo Kastrup

Bernardo Kastrup, a computer engineer turned metaphysician, recently posted a short essay called “The Threat of Panpsychism: A Warning.” I found the essay somewhat encouraging if only because it is another signal that contemporary philosophy (both within and outside academia) is moving beyond the tired “materialism v. anything else” debate and toward more interesting and relevant debates, like that […]

Continue reading "The Threat of Panpsychism?: A response to Bernardo Kastrup"