Causality in Whitehead’s Panentheism

Plasticbodies has posted another volley in the theism-nihilism discussion, this time drawing attention to causality. He asks: What does process theology give us that a (process) naturalism cannot? Or, put otherwise, how does one get from nature to divinity without begging the question? I'll paste my comments in response here: I have written quite a [...]

Religion and Philosophy: The God Problem

The discussion continues over on Levi Bryant's blog. Bryant agrees with me that Whitehead's conception of God does not fall prey to many of the ethical and epistemological criticisms he levels against traditional theism. But he fails to understand the problem that Whitehead's God is purported to have solved. Whitehead's style of philosophizing has much [...]

Ontology and God: a further response to Levi Bryant

I posted the following as a comment to Bryant's short response. Adam Robbert has a nice comment there, too. There is no necessary relationship between OOO (or ontology generally) and theology or morality, but certainly every ontology has theological and moral implications. To the extent that OOO has something in common with Whitehead’s process ontology, [...]

SR/OOO and Nihilism: a response to Harman and Bryant

I've already posted a short response to Harman, but I wanted to re-visit the issues explored in that post concerning the difference between Homo Sapiens, as an object among objects, and the Anthropos, as an ideal toward which every object tends. I will also try to disentangle my own "cosmotheandric" position from the generic anti-nihilism [...]