2 Comments

1. Pingback: The Subject-Object Divide, Corey Anton, and on the Priority Debate between Being and Knowing (Part 2) | milliern
2. Pingback: “Nature is a priori” -Schelling | Footnotes 2 Plato
3. Pingback: Thinking Through Atheism in a Religious Cosmos (response to professoranton) | Footnotes 2 Plato

4. Hey Matt, have you read any Galen Strawson or David Skrbina on Panpsychism?
   It may have the potential to become the foundations of a new world view.

   Reply

   1. I have. I don’t think they emphasize the process relational dimension enough, though. Still too substance-based.

      Whitehead’s panexperientalism is the most sophisticated and compatible with science and spirituality that I’ve come across.

      Reply

What do you think? Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.