A string of videos pondering the essence of religion, beginning with suicideforcelluloid and anekantavad. Professoranton and I then exchanged a few responses (below).
“Philosophy begins in wonder. And, at the end, when philosophic thought has done its best, the wonder remains.”
—Alfred North Whitehead
Recent Posts
- Stream on Capitol Insurrection January 10, 2021
- “How does matter give rise to consciousness?” (response to Sam Harris) January 3, 2021
- A review of Michael Hogue’s “American Immanence: Democracy for an Uncertain World” (2018) December 18, 2020
- Voices of VR podcast: A Primer on Whitehead’s Process Philosophy December 10, 2020
- Who are we? (thinking w/ Berry and Swimme) December 9, 2020
- Thinking with Carlo Rovelli: The Physics of Consciousness December 3, 2020
- Science and the Soul of the World: Participatory Knowing in Goethe and Whitehead November 25, 2020
- Dialoguing with Philip Goff about Consciousness, Panpsychism, and Process Philosophy November 18, 2020
- Concrescence and the Implicate Order: Whitehead and Bohm in Dialogue November 8, 2020
- Election Coverage: Live-streaming on Growing Down November 3, 2020
- Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism) October 30, 2020
- Apology for a Democratic Ontology (response to Keith Woods) October 29, 2020
- Rune Soup Podcast with Gordon White: Talking Whitehead, Plato, & Panpsychism October 24, 2020
- Thinking Cosmologically with Whitehead October 21, 2020
- Towards a Marian Consciousness (Ep. 1 of the Great American Road Trip Diaries) October 21, 2020
- Alchemical Consciousness After Descartes: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism as Psychedelic Realism October 15, 2020
- American Immanental Philosophies and the Future of Theopolitics: Dialoging with Michael Hogue October 15, 2020
- The brain is not a computer, and thinking is not information-processing. October 14, 2020
- “The Great American Trip,” dialogue on “Growing Down” October 10, 2020
- Rupert Sheldrake on Whitehead September 26, 2020
- Reason, Reality, & Religion in the Making (dialoguing with John Vervaeke) September 13, 2020
- Naturphilosophie as Process Philosophy in Schelling and Whitehead August 30, 2020
- Meta-Linguistics (dialoguing with Layman Pascal) August 29, 2020
- Metamodernism, the Integral Left, and Postmodern Traditionalism (dialoguing with Brent Cooper) August 27, 2020
- Parsimonious Panpsychism? (response to Julian Walker) August 25, 2020
- Emergent Evolution in a Panpsychist Cosmos (dialoging with Corey Anton) August 22, 2020
- Setting the Akashic Record Straight (final response to David Long about emergence and panpsychism) August 21, 2020
- What is at stake in cosmological inquiry? August 20, 2020
- Cosmologies in Question: A Debate with David Long August 19, 2020
- Consciousness in the Wild August 17, 2020
- Toward an Integral “God” – a dialogue with Layman Pascal August 14, 2020
- Death Denial in a Panpsychist Cosmos: A Dialogue with Corey Anton August 11, 2020
- Meta-Politics – a discussion with Layman Pascal on “The Integral Stage” August 8, 2020
- Remembering and Carrying Forward Michael Brooks on “Growing Down” July 25, 2020
- Dialogue with a Whiteheadian Thelemite Vajrayanist Wiccan, Sam Webster July 22, 2020
- The Rheomode Series, a YouTube playlist July 16, 2020
- Integral Entheogens (Ep. 5) – Molecular Alchemy and the Evolution of Spirit July 16, 2020
- Growing Down Podcast on “the Integral Left” July 4, 2020
- Dialoguing with Brent Cooper about ecosocialist politics and integral spirituality June 9, 2020
- “He maketh his sun to rise,” featuring Donald Trump, Cornel West, and Ram Dass June 4, 2020
- The Place of Psychedelic Chemistry/Alchemical Consciousness in Philosophy May 8, 2020
- Imagination as the Topographical Inversion of Reality: Musings with Becca Tarnas May 7, 2020
- Episode 6 of The Future Faces of Spirit April 25, 2020
- Reading and Riffing on Murray Bookchin’s “The Ecology of Freedom” April 15, 2020
- Prayers to a Process-Relational God April 12, 2020
- Ecological Civilization, or Anarcho-Primitivism? March 30, 2020
- Imagining a Gaian Reality After the Virus March 23, 2020
- Thoughts on William James, Pure Experience, and Materialism February 2, 2020
- Musing on “Consciousness” with William James & Alfred North Whitehead January 31, 2020
- What is life? interview with Tim Freke January 17, 2020
#occupy
aesthetics
alchemy
Anima mundi
Anthropos
archetypal cosmology
atheism
biology
Buddhism
burning man
capitalism
causality
Chaos
Christ
christianity
cognitive science
Consciousness
Cosmogenesis
cosmology
cosmopolitics
cosmotheandric
creativity
death
earth
ecological crisis
ecology
economics
emergence
eternal object
etheric imagination
evolution
Evolution of consciousness
freedom
Gaia
German Idealism
god
imagination
integral
language
life
logos
love
materialism
media ecology
metaphysics
mind
myth
nature
Naturphilosophie
neuroscience
Object-oriented ontology
Ontology
organism
Panpsychism
phenomenology
philosophy
physics
play
pluralism
politics
Process
Process philosophy
Psychedelics
Religion
science
soul
soul-making
space-time
Spirit
spirituality
technology
teleology
theology
time
world-soul
Alan Watts Albert Einstein Alfred North Whitehead Ancient Philosophy Aristotle autopoiesis Brian Swimme Bruno Latour Carl Jung Catherine Keller Coleridge Copernican Revolution Daniel Dennett Darwin David Chalmers Descartes Donna Haraway Edmund Husserl Evan Thompson Extended Mind Fichte Francisco Varela galileo Gilles Deleuze Goethe Graham Harman Hegel Heidegger henri bergson Hume Iain Hamilton Grant imagination Isabelle Stengers Jakob Böhme James Hillman Jean Gebser john Keats Kant kepler Levi Bryant Modern Philosophy Owen Barfield Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Plato poetry politics PZ Myers quentin meillassoux race Raimon Panikkar Ralph Waldo Emerson Ray Brassier reason Religion Richard Dawkins Richard Tarnas Robert N. Bellah Romantic Philosophy rudolf steiner Schelling Sean Kelly Socrates speculative realism Spinoza Steven Shaviro Thomas Berry Timothy Morton Travel William James Wittgenstein
Posts I Like
Archives
Top Clicks
- academia.edu/27796967/2016_Shook_Pa…
- schumachercollege.org.uk/courses/sh…
- stephenerobbins.com/talks/Relativit…
- ciis.edu/faculty-and-staff-director…
- docs.google.com/document/d/1Gdm16zr…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- tomcarter12.wordpress.com
- garygoldbergmd.wordpress.com
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
Copyright

footnotes2plato.com by Matthew David Segall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Blog Stats
- 641,907 hits
Albert Einstein Alfred North Whitehead Ancient Philosophy Aristotle autopoiesis Brian Swimme Bruno Latour Carl Jung Coleridge Copernican Revolution Daniel Dennett Darwin Descartes Edmund Husserl Evan Thompson Fichte Francisco Varela galileo Gilles Deleuze Goethe Graham Harman Hegel Heidegger henri bergson Hume Iain Hamilton Grant imagination Isabelle Stengers Jakob Böhme Jean Gebser Kant kepler Levi Bryant Modern Philosophy Owen Barfield Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Plato poetry politics race reason Religion Richard Dawkins Richard Tarnas Romantic Philosophy rudolf steiner Schelling Sean Kelly speculative realism William James
Recent Posts
- Stream on Capitol Insurrection January 10, 2021
- “How does matter give rise to consciousness?” (response to Sam Harris) January 3, 2021
- A review of Michael Hogue’s “American Immanence: Democracy for an Uncertain World” (2018) December 18, 2020
- Voices of VR podcast: A Primer on Whitehead’s Process Philosophy December 10, 2020
- Who are we? (thinking w/ Berry and Swimme) December 9, 2020
- Thinking with Carlo Rovelli: The Physics of Consciousness December 3, 2020
- Science and the Soul of the World: Participatory Knowing in Goethe and Whitehead November 25, 2020
- Dialoguing with Philip Goff about Consciousness, Panpsychism, and Process Philosophy November 18, 2020
- Concrescence and the Implicate Order: Whitehead and Bohm in Dialogue November 8, 2020
- Election Coverage: Live-streaming on Growing Down November 3, 2020
- Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism) October 30, 2020
- Apology for a Democratic Ontology (response to Keith Woods) October 29, 2020
- Rune Soup Podcast with Gordon White: Talking Whitehead, Plato, & Panpsychism October 24, 2020
- Thinking Cosmologically with Whitehead October 21, 2020
- Towards a Marian Consciousness (Ep. 1 of the Great American Road Trip Diaries) October 21, 2020
- Alchemical Consciousness After Descartes: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism as Psychedelic Realism October 15, 2020
- American Immanental Philosophies and the Future of Theopolitics: Dialoging with Michael Hogue October 15, 2020
- The brain is not a computer, and thinking is not information-processing. October 14, 2020
- “The Great American Trip,” dialogue on “Growing Down” October 10, 2020
- Rupert Sheldrake on Whitehead September 26, 2020
- Reason, Reality, & Religion in the Making (dialoguing with John Vervaeke) September 13, 2020
- Naturphilosophie as Process Philosophy in Schelling and Whitehead August 30, 2020
- Meta-Linguistics (dialoguing with Layman Pascal) August 29, 2020
- Metamodernism, the Integral Left, and Postmodern Traditionalism (dialoguing with Brent Cooper) August 27, 2020
- Parsimonious Panpsychism? (response to Julian Walker) August 25, 2020
- Emergent Evolution in a Panpsychist Cosmos (dialoging with Corey Anton) August 22, 2020
- Setting the Akashic Record Straight (final response to David Long about emergence and panpsychism) August 21, 2020
- What is at stake in cosmological inquiry? August 20, 2020
- Cosmologies in Question: A Debate with David Long August 19, 2020
- Consciousness in the Wild August 17, 2020
- Toward an Integral “God” – a dialogue with Layman Pascal August 14, 2020
- Death Denial in a Panpsychist Cosmos: A Dialogue with Corey Anton August 11, 2020
- Meta-Politics – a discussion with Layman Pascal on “The Integral Stage” August 8, 2020
- Remembering and Carrying Forward Michael Brooks on “Growing Down” July 25, 2020
- Dialogue with a Whiteheadian Thelemite Vajrayanist Wiccan, Sam Webster July 22, 2020
- The Rheomode Series, a YouTube playlist July 16, 2020
- Integral Entheogens (Ep. 5) – Molecular Alchemy and the Evolution of Spirit July 16, 2020
- Growing Down Podcast on “the Integral Left” July 4, 2020
- Dialoguing with Brent Cooper about ecosocialist politics and integral spirituality June 9, 2020
- “He maketh his sun to rise,” featuring Donald Trump, Cornel West, and Ram Dass June 4, 2020
- The Place of Psychedelic Chemistry/Alchemical Consciousness in Philosophy May 8, 2020
- Imagination as the Topographical Inversion of Reality: Musings with Becca Tarnas May 7, 2020
- Episode 6 of The Future Faces of Spirit April 25, 2020
- Reading and Riffing on Murray Bookchin’s “The Ecology of Freedom” April 15, 2020
- Prayers to a Process-Relational God April 12, 2020
- Ecological Civilization, or Anarcho-Primitivism? March 30, 2020
- Imagining a Gaian Reality After the Virus March 23, 2020
- Thoughts on William James, Pure Experience, and Materialism February 2, 2020
- Musing on “Consciousness” with William James & Alfred North Whitehead January 31, 2020
- What is life? interview with Tim Freke January 17, 2020
#occupy
aesthetics
alchemy
Anima mundi
Anthropos
archetypal cosmology
atheism
biology
Buddhism
burning man
capitalism
causality
Chaos
Christ
christianity
cognitive science
Consciousness
Cosmogenesis
cosmology
cosmopolitics
cosmotheandric
creativity
death
earth
ecological crisis
ecology
economics
emergence
eternal object
etheric imagination
evolution
Evolution of consciousness
freedom
Gaia
German Idealism
god
imagination
integral
language
life
logos
love
materialism
media ecology
metaphysics
mind
myth
nature
Naturphilosophie
neuroscience
Object-oriented ontology
Ontology
organism
Panpsychism
phenomenology
philosophy
physics
play
pluralism
politics
Process
Process philosophy
Psychedelics
Religion
science
soul
soul-making
space-time
Spirit
spirituality
technology
teleology
theology
time
world-soul
Posts I Like
Archives
Top Clicks
- academia.edu/27796967/2016_Shook_Pa…
- schumachercollege.org.uk/courses/sh…
- stephenerobbins.com/talks/Relativit…
- ciis.edu/faculty-and-staff-director…
- docs.google.com/document/d/1Gdm16zr…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- tomcarter12.wordpress.com
- garygoldbergmd.wordpress.com
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
- matthewsegall.files.wordpress.com/2…
Copyright

footnotes2plato.com by Matthew David Segall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Blog Stats
- 641,907 hits
MDS, see what you think of:
ps why start the genealogy with “myths” as opposed to animism/ghosts/luck/etc as these seem more likely early phenomenological experiences, no?
Yeah, I lumped two early “structures of consciousness” (“magic” and “mythic” to use Gebser’s typology) into one. Sloppy but thats what happens in 10 minute extemporaneous YouTube vids.
Matt, do you intend to add Anton’s additional video response to you?
Thanks for the reminder, Milliern. Just added it.
“J.C.: No! I am not resurrecting the old comparative-religion thesis that there is an underlying transcendental form or essence or universal that we can cull from differing empirical religious beliefs, that can be approached only asymptotically by empirical cases. I am saying that the inherited religious traditions contain something deeper, which is why they are important. I don’t marginalize religious traditions; they are our indispensable inheritance. Without them, human experience would be impoverished, its horizon narrowed. We would be deprived of their resources, not know the name of Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, the startling notion of the “kingdom of God,” the idea of the messianic and so on. As a philosopher I am, of course, interested in what happens, but always in terms of what is going on in what happens. The particular religious traditions are what happen, and they are precious, but my interest lies in what is going on in these traditions, in the memory of Jesus, say. But different traditions contain different desires, promises, memories, dreams, futures, a different sense of time and space. Nothing says that underneath they are all the same.”
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/deconstructing-god/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
Thanks to you and Corey for another interesting dialogue.
I just wanted to make a few remarks about what was said with regard to science. The first thing is that falsificationism —the idea that science proceeds on the basis of falsifying theories, part and parcel— is not a possible mode by which science can progress. Consider a collection of theoretical statements, the set ‘P’ constituted by n statements ‘p’, such that P = (p1, p2, p3,…), whereby the collection of statements (a theory) asserts some prediction, call it ‘Q’. Truth-functional logic states that, in the case of ‘¬Q’, modus tollens expresses the state of affairs as:
P -> Q
¬Q
———
∴¬P
The problem is that, of the collection of statements in theory ‘P’, it is unclear which statement(s) is (are) false. The topic gets quite a bit more complicated, but this should clarify much. I should also say that this actually goes for single statements (such as protocol statements of Neurath and the logical empiricists), in the sense that individual statements are constituted by collections of assumptions.
One reason I wanted to bring this up is that I know and meet many scientists who think that what they are doing is Popperian-style falsification, at which point I have to explain that’s not possible; and so I want to propagate this point to philosophers and the philosophically inclined, likewise.
I have a lot to say about the statement “there’s something like a scientific method,” but all I will say is: no, historically, there doesn’t seem to be, and, if there is, no two areas in science agree on it (and no single science agrees on it for very long). Moreover, find two scientists, even in the same field, that agree upon what resides in such a method. (I have been to numerous conferences and workshops in which such matters continually being decided.) Much has been written on “styles of reasoning” that emerge from historical studies of science and, more generally, intellectual thought. My personal opinion is that the difference between empirical science (i.e., not theoretical science) and religion is just what James thought the difference was: empirical science has something to butt up against, i.e., reality, whereas religion does not, meaning that religion is not empirical, which is precisely why James said that our moral holiday is justified.
What you say reminds me of Feyerabend’s Against Method wherein he (in)famously says “anything goes.” I’m sympathetic to it. I plan on making another video soon about science to complement this video about religion. Certainly there is much left in the dark about how “Science” (if such a unified approach exists) operates in Popper’s falsificationist account. Popper doesn’t have much to say about how new theories are developed, other than to appeal to the spontaneous and imaginative leaps of creative genius. I think this begs the question as to the true relation between mind and nature.
I would dispute the idea that James’ final say on religion is that it is not empirical. He spent a great deal of time thinking through religious experience. Maybe it is not empirical in the traditional sense of being based on raw sensory data; but certainly one can approach religion using the expanded “radical empiricism” articulated by James. Maybe James doesn’t go far enough in this direction as I’d like… Whitehead gets closer when he says “In its solitariness the spirit asks, What, in the way of value, is the attainment of life? And it can find no such value till it has merged its individual claim with that of the objective universe. Religion is world-loyalty” (Religion in the Making).
It doesn’t necessarily mean that anything goes, it just means that the covering law and falsificationism, i.e., most every major tenet of logical empiricism, isn’t descriptive of how science works.
“Empirical in the traditional sense” is a good distinction to begin to draw. The sense datum that typifies empiricism empiricism doesn’t entail existential and similar types of sense, so that should be admitted to the discussion. I do think the pragmatists are on the verge of existentialism, especially in the way that Peirce talks about inquiry being driven by doubt, which is brought about by some intellectual agitation.
I haven’t had the chance to read your thesis yet, but Peirce’s abduction might interest you, so far as imagination and theory creation goes. Norwood Russell Hanson talks about it in a number of places, aside from Peirce’s own writings. James talks about the ambulatory (as opposed to the saltatory) nature of hypothesis (as well as reasoning and cognition). Maybe you are already familiar.