2 thoughts on “David Chalmers, Andy Clark, and Paul Churchland on Neuroscience, Consciousness, Physicalism, and Panpsychism

  1. I agree, consciousness cannot be explained in terms of classical ‘laws’. Perhaps the problem is that to understand consciousness you have to operate on a higher level of consciousness. Then everyone else will reject your ideas though. It is all very well linking consciousness with degree of information. But why has consciousness evolved? Why is evolution only described in terms of adaptation?
    Also see my comments in wikipedia Hume’s missing shade of blue (ref 3). David Hume was one of a few who understood consciousness but his ideas still are completely ignored. Gautama Buddhas was another

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s