“The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”
–Alfred North Whitehead

Towards a new root image in natural science…

Here is anthropologist Anne Buchanan on the post-truth era in natural science.

I was reminded of my post on the federally-funded Brain Initiative a few years ago.

Buchanan includes geneticist Ken Weiss’ list of facts that do not fit the reductionistic paradigm of “normal science” in biology at the end of her post.

Weiss and Buchanan have co-authored the book The Mermaid’s Tale: Four Billion Years of Cooperation in the Making of Living Things

Though I haven’t read their book yet, Buchanan and Weiss’ perspective seems to dovetail nicely with what I argue (with Whitehead’s help) in Physics of the World-Soul: that the paradigm shift required to make sense of self-organizing dynamics active at the biological scale will also need to make sense of the self-organizing dynamics active at the quantum and astrophysical scales. In short, mechanical models describable solely in terms of efficient causation cannot account for the observable facts of physics or of biology. Organism must replace mechanism as the root image, and formal and final causation must be reincorporated into a more adequate naturalistic ontology—a naturalism wherein value and experience are intrinsic to every process of realty.

Advertisement

Posted

in

,

by

Comments

3 responses to “Towards a new root image in natural science…”

  1. Sam Mickey Avatar

    I like mermaids! This seems like an interesting book. The paradigm shift away from mechanism reminds me of Nietzsche saying something about how we shouldn’t think that the universe is a machine. The point isn’t that the universe is better than a machine but quite the opposite: “machine” is too honorable a word for the whirling world. Here’s Freddy from the Gay Science:
    Let us now be on our guard against believing that the universe is a machine; it is assuredly not constructed with a view to one end; we invest it with far too high an honor with the word “machine” […] The general character of the world, on the other hand, is to all eternity chaos; not by the absence of necessity, but in the sense of the absence of order, structure, form, beauty, wisdom, and whatever else our aesthetic humanities are called. […] Let us be on our guard against ascribing to it heartlessness and unreason, or their opposites.

    1. Matthew David Segall Avatar

      Reminds me of Whitehead’s: “[Creativity or Chaos] prevents us from considering the temporal world as a definite actual creature. For the temporal world is an essential incompleteness.” (Religion in the Making)

  2. posthumousman Avatar
    posthumousman

    Are you familiar with complex systems theory?

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: