“The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”
–Alfred North Whitehead

William Irwin Thompson’s Thoughts on Evil

I don’t think the copyright gods would frown on me reposting the late Bill Thompson’s blog reply to me June 11, 2013. It is available here on the Way Back Machine. He was responding to a philosophical memoir about my encounter with evil in Israel that I’d titled “Thinking the Holocaust With Schelling.”

THOUGHTS ON EVIL, June 11, 2013

By William Irwin Thompson

Dear Matt, [Matthew Segall, Doctoral Candidate at the California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco] That was a good essay on Evil posted on your BLOG, Footnotes 2 Plato (https://footnotes2plato.com/2013/06/13/thinking-the-holocaust-with-schelling/), if I may be paradoxical about such a serious issue.

I make a similar point, but, of course, like the blade of grass at your feet you mention, also take a different tack into the resisting wind. See MY 1976, EVIL AND WORLD ORDER, p.83 f., and then again in my novel, ISLANDS OUT OF TIME, 1985. I see now why you wanted to go to CIIS when I hoped you could get a fellowship to the University of Chicago. The new CIIS seems to have worked out very well for you.

Ever since the hominization of the primates, the survival of the group has been based on identity, and identity-formation was based on the creation of an “other” in which “we” could be figured against a “them.” So chimps and elephants can empathize with a fellow member of their group and seek to console them. To enhance group solidarity chimp males will go on hunting trips in groups where they will seek out an Other in the form of Colobus monkeys. When these monkeys scream as the chimps dismember them and eat them alive the chimps do not empathize with the monkeys but rather most probably feel the companionship and solidarity with their group that will be needed in the future to defend themselves against enemies. This is the Bruderbund, the famous comradeship of the men in the German Wehrmacht, or even in the JDF persecuting the Palestinians. In order for these normal German or Israeli soldiers to do evil they must be good to one another.

This loyal behavior is the social evil that is part of the identity formation of the binary “Us” and “Them.” But there is a higher and more scary evil that is Metaphysical Evil–the evil not so much of the Wehrmacht but the SS. Just as Hitler was an artist manque’, so the metaphysically evil person is a mystic manque’. He hates God and His ego trip of the Higher Plan in which all is made nice in the end. The metaphysical evil person thrusts each murdered baby in God’s face and says: “Is it worth it if it is based on this?”

Just as mystics feel an ecstatic union with Godhead in Love, so the mystic manque’ feels the ecstasy of the Hatred of God. Heinrich Himmler reveled in occult and esoteric mysteries that were parodies of the Rosicrucian underground. Evil, of course, requires something to violate, so the “Devil is the Ape of God” and cannot create, for to create would be to fall into the metaphysical sin of Being–of God’s disgusting Existence that is based on suffering. Because the metaphysically evil person is not simply following orders and staying in ranks with his group, he is scary to the ordinary folk who conform to norms, whatever they are. This is why villains so fascinate us, and why evil characters hold our attention. William Blake noticed this paradox when he read Milton’s Paradise Lost: that his Satan was fascinating but his God was a pompous ass and an inflated windbag. Notice in Blake’s image above how St. Michael the Archangel fighting Satan has become a Yin/Yang mandala of the mutual entanglement of Light and Dark. 

But Blake’s art can also lead us to a deeper understanding of the cultural phenomenology of myth and art. In telling stories the artist can become a shaman or medium and draw off deeper levels under the more limited surface- consciousness so that in telling one story, he or she is also telling another and larger story. The story of the battle of St. Michael the Archangel with Satan is also the story of the evolution of the solar system recast into a dream narrative. Like all Creation stories, from the Babylonian Semitic Enuma Elish to the Judaic Semitic Genesis, or Hesiod’sTheogeny, the story is not a literal but a figurative and metaphoric rendering of the emergence of our ordered world from chaos. St. Michael is the sun and Satan is the primordial and dark gaseous nebula, and the “war in heaven” is a rendering of the swirling bumper car battles before there emerged a sun, planets, and a Kuiper Belt of planetoids, asteroids, and cosmic car wrecks. Similarly, the story of Eve being taken out of Adam is a story of the moon being taken out of the primordial Earth from the collision of Thea with Earth. When a fundamentalist takes myth literally, he is thinking like a simple-minded superstitious peasant and is completely lacking in an understanding of the shamanic nature of under-consciousness transmissions, story-telling, and art. Blake is a perfect example of the archaic shamanic artist living in the midst of the Industrial Revolution.

Because “We become what we hate,” the tragic wheel spins round and Satan paradoxically becomes Christic and feels our cosmic suffering and takes on a soteric life in Hell to negate God’s ego trip.  And in the moral paradoxes of the West Bank settlers, one can imagine a karmic “likely story” in which Nazis reincarnate as JDF soldiers shooting Palestinian teenagers or bulldozing to death protestors. The only way off this metaphysical moebius strip of Samsara, in which the President, the NSA and the CIA violate the Constitution in fighting terrorism and become an infected force for evil themselves, is to get off the wheel of love and hate as identity-formation to ascend into Universal Compassion.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

3 responses to “William Irwin Thompson’s Thoughts on Evil”

  1. iainmcgilchrist Avatar
    iainmcgilchrist

    I don’t think Thompson’s reply tells us much at all.  Your piece on the Holocaust and Schelling however remains powerful and insightful. I read a couple of days ago this piece: https://www.thearticle.com/the-malign-universe-of-auschwitz?utm_source=bibblio_article_page ; and although it is not telling me anything I didn’t already know about the unfathomable horror of the Holocaust, the sense of Levi and Wiesel struggling with theodicy and deciding there was none came home to me in a way that has been hard to shake off.

    All best wishes,

    Iain

    1. Matthew David Segall Avatar

      Thank you, Iain. I think the closest Wiesel comes to theodicy is when he records seeing a child struggling in a noose, with another prisoner asking, “Where is God now?”, then having him answer his own question: “He is hanging here on the gallows.” I think immediately of Whitehead’s lines about God “the fellow-sufferer who understands” on the final page of Process and Reality. Perhaps in context Wiesel meant something closer to the Nietzschean death of God–that such evil makes belief in God impossible–, rather than the Whiteheadian process God. The evils of human history do make belief in a God who is supposedly both omnipotent and omnibenevolent impossible. But it leaves open the possibility of a God illimitable in goodness but without the sort of power to prevent evil done by human beings. Such is the weight of freedom. There is no one else to blame but ourselves.

  2. Roy Smith Avatar
    Roy Smith

    I think the problem of Evil and the Holocaust in particular are only understandable from the transcendental view. Reading the case histories of those under LBL (Life Between Life) Hypnosis in Journey of Souls, by Michael Newton, we find the answer in why we take up a life in the first place. I would leave it to Newton how and why one would take up a particularly difficult life when we decide with our spiritual guides which life we will take, but what was revealed by Holocaust survivors under LBL hypnosis was that to knowingly take up such a life was to accelerate their spiritual evolution. Apparently, there are levels of soul development that are readily seen and experienced in those realms of higher reality. We graduate from one type of radiance to a higher type of radiance at each level, and we become teachers to those at lower levels. It makes sense if you think about it, since the experience is the best teacher, and we need to “know our stuff” to teach those evolving after us. So, the whole premise here is that those souls who came into the horrible conditions of the camps, chose those conditions for reasons of soul evolution.

What do you think?