Agency in the Universe: Towards a Physics of the World-Soul

Comments

6 responses to “Agency in the Universe: Towards a Physics of the World-Soul”

1. The Subject-Object Divide, Corey Anton, and on the Priority Debate between Being and Knowing (Part 2) | milliern

   December 26, 2013

   […] Matt hit on this, to some small extent in his response video and another video (found at: https://footnotes2plato.com/2013/12/07/agency-in-the-universe-towards-a-physics-of-the-world-soul/)[4], but the word “hylozoism” escaped him.  It is the idea that, in all matter, there is some […]

   Reply
2. 

   “Nature is a priori” -Schelling | Footnotes 2 Plato

   December 26, 2013

   […] to milliern for his commentary on and reflections about an exchange Professor Corey Anton, myself, and others have been having on YouTube. I’m reposting my comment to him […]

   Reply
3. 

   Thinking Through Atheism in a Religious Cosmos (response to professoranton) | Footnotes 2 Plato

   March 17, 2014

   […] for a worldly religion, our unorthodox positions in the theism vs. atheism run together. But, as we’ve made explicit before, we part ways when it comes to the question of agency’s place in the cosmos. I defend a […]

   Reply
4. 

   Tom

   August 23, 2014

   Hey Matt, have you read any Galen Strawson or David Skrbina on Panpsychism?
   It may have the potential to become the foundations of a new world view.

   Reply
   1. 

      Matthew David Segall

      August 23, 2014

      I have. I don’t think they emphasize the process relational dimension enough, though. Still too substance-based.

      Whitehead’s panexperientalism is the most sophisticated and compatible with science and spirituality that I’ve come across.

      Reply
5. 

   “Nature is a priori” -Schelling – We ARE Nature

   September 20, 2021

   […] to milliern for his commentary on and reflections about an exchange Professor Corey Anton, myself, and others have been having on YouTube. I’m reposting my comment to him […]

   Reply