“The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”
–Alfred North Whitehead

Hunger for Wholeness podcast with Dr. Ilia Delio

I had a wonderful conversation with Ilia Delio and Gabbi Sloan a few weeks ago, Part 1 of which was just released here. We discuss a number of topics, including the problem of evil. Part 2 continues the conversation here.

The podcast comes out of Dr. Delio’s work with the Center for Christogenesis. She has a great line up of prior episodes with guests including David Sloan Wilson and Bruce Damer.

Advertisement

by

Comments

3 responses to “Hunger for Wholeness podcast with Dr. Ilia Delio”

  1. Nathalie Bethesda Avatar

    Matt, I responded to your conversation with Iain McGilchrist. It was wonderful. Thank you. I have listened to both of these podcasts, and they are equally of great value. My ears pricked up particularly, when you spoke about answers lying in learning.
    This morning I was reading your 2012(?) post about thinking with Steiner. Beautiful. Imagine. If we could all do that! https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sustainable-schooling-nathalie-bethesda/

  2. Daniel Schulman Avatar
    Daniel Schulman

    That ‘God needs us’, that ‘God is incomplete without our participation’, that ‘God is longing for ccompletion’ , that ‘God needs the human being to reconcile the light and the dark’. . . that these notions are ‘radical’ . . . is just screaming out for this dialogue to include a voice steeped deeply in Jewish mysticism (and core Kabbalistic principles of God as Ein Sof, of Creation as a Tzimtzum process (which Idel posits as the ontic-pre-ontological basis for evil), the role of Mitzvot and even on marriage in the reconciliation process, the bidirectional nature of ‘angels’ in the depth-process-framing of Souls), . . .

  3. schulman81 Avatar

    That ‘God needs us’, that ‘God is incomplete without our participation’, that ‘God is longing for ccompletion’ , that ‘God needs the human being to reconcile the light and the dark’. . . that these notions are ‘radical’ . . . is just screaming out for this dialogue to include a voice steeped deeply in Jewish mysticism (and core Kabbalistic principles of God as Ein Sof, of Creation as a Tzimtzum process (which Idel posits as the ontic-pre-ontological basis for evil), the role of Mitzvot and even on marriage in the reconciliation process, the bidirectional nature of ‘angels’ in the depth-process-framing of Souls), . . .

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: