“The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”
–Alfred North Whitehead

“Astrology: Science, Art, or Religion?”

Here’s the recording of a lecture that Becca Tarnas and I delivered last night for the Atlanta Astrological Society.

Here are some relevant links if you want a more in depth discussion on some of what I mention in this lecture:

The Politics of Renaissance Hermeticism, and the Magic of Science

The Copernican Odyssey: From Kantian Skepticism to Tarnasian Participation, or from the Dawn of Modern Science to the Wisdom of the Midnight Sun

Pluto and the Underworld of Scientific Knowledge Production

The Universe as a Work of Art: Images of the Cosmos in Plato, Descartes, and Kepler

The Poetics of Copernican Cosmology

Plato and Astrosophy: The Wisdom of the Sky

Rate this:

Posted

September 20, 2019

Ancient Philosophy, Aristotle, Carl Jung, Copernican Revolution, Galileo, imagination, James Hillman, Kepler, Modern Philosophy, Plato, politics, Ptolemy, reason, Religion

Matthew David Segall

Tags:

archetypal astrology, astrology, science

Comments

What do you think? Cancel reply

Enter your comment here…

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

“Astrology: Science, Art, or Religion?”

Rate this:

Share this:

Like this:

Comments

What do you think? Cancel reply